1. Do such “campaigns” impede the goals of community policing?
2. Do the goals of community policing and “
zero-tolerance policing” work against one another?
3. Are these worthy goals for law enforcement or are they merely public relations gimmicks that make the
public think that something new and unique is being done?
4. Does such questioning as in the Dearborn case constitute
racial profiling?
5. What does
United States v. Martinez-Fuertesuggest about the propriety of racial profiling in law enforcement?
? Does the
case justify activities like those in Dearborn?