Posted: May 8th, 2015
AED6001 ASSESSMENT 1 Report
AED6001 ASSESSMENT 1 Report
Due date: Week 6, . Weighting: 20%
Length: 1600 words
This task will be assessed against the following criteria:
|
context. (5) 4 |
|
Evidence
Interpretation and critical analysis
Argumentation
|
Impressive and original depth of understanding of topic.
Highly reflective use of evidence
Highly critical and reflexive analysis
Convincing synthesis of evidence, analysis and understanding in argumentation
|
Thorough and comprehensive understanding of topic.
Considered weighing of evidence
Thorough and sustained critical analysis
Convincing synthesis of evidence, analysis and understanding in argumentation |
Clear understanding of topic.
Arguments sustained by reference to relevant evidence.
Issues and theories considered critically.
Credible argument making good use of evidence, analysis and understanding |
Adequate understanding of topic.
Occasional tendency to assertions not supported by evidence
Limited interpretation and critical analysis.
Reasonably well-argued discussion of topic |
Conversant with topic but serious gaps or errors.
General lack of evidence in supporting arguments
Lacks depth of understanding and demonstrates undeveloped critical analysis.
Inconsistent argumentation and lack of clarity |
Major aspects of the topic ignored.
Poor or no use of evidence in supporting arguments
Poor understanding of issues and no critical analysis
Poor argumentation
|
||||
| 2.Methodology
Critical appraisal of research design
Methods and procedures
Synthesis of analysis with literature
|
Assured and critical discussion of methodology and implications
Critical and reflexive appraisal of research design
Displays highly critical and reflective understanding and analysis of methods and procedures used
Reflective discussion of convergence and divergence of research findings in context of literature |
A clear discussion of methodology, showing understanding of implications
Critical appraisal of research design
Displays critical understanding and analysis of methods and procedures used
Relates and discusses convergence and divergence of findings from research literature |
Discussion of methodology, showing awareness of implications
Some critical analysis of the research design.
Displays clear understanding and analysis of methods and procedures used
Considers convergence and divergence of findings from research literature
|
Some awareness of research methodologies and their implications
Limited critique of research design
Reasons for choice of methods and procedures given.
Limited discussion of convergence and divergence of findings from research literature |
No clear evidence of understanding research methodologies
Inconsistent critique of research design
Methods and procedures explained, but no reason for choice given
No discussion of convergence and divergence of findings from research literature |
Research not methodology poorly or not discussed
Poor or no critique of research design.
Methods and procedures lack explanation
No discussion of convergence and divergence of findings from research literature |
||||
| 3.. Theory, practice and research synthesis
Use of personal and professional experience
Implications for wider context
|
Sensitive and effective use of personal experience to evaluate links between theory, research and practice; work potentially worth dissemination
Well-articulated, critical and reflexive use of personal professional experience to illuminate discussion.
Assesses critically and originally the impact of findings for the wider context
|
Considered discussion to evaluate links between theory, research and practice; work potentially worth dissemination
Thorough and effective use of personal professional experience to illuminate discussion.
Assesses clearly the impact of findings for the wider context
|
Beginning to develop critical reflection and analysis of practice through theory and research
Good use of personal professional experience to illuminate discussion.
Some discussion of the impact of findings for the wider context
|
Links between theory, research and practice partially considered.
Illustrates work with some examples from personal experiences.
Very little consideration of the impact of findings for the wider context
|
Very little consideration of how theory and research might be related to practice.
Tendency towards anecdote in discussion of personal experience.
Consideration of the impact of findings for the wider context lacking in credibility
|
No consideration of relationships between theory, practice and research
No evidence of relating professional experience to the assignment/dissertation.
No consideration of the impact of findings for the wider context
|
||||
Referencing
|
Presentation of a high quality very few typos, errors in punctuation.
Referencing is always correct
|
Well presented, generally few typos, errors in punctuation etc.
Referencing is always correct. |
Follows required presentational practices, a few typos, errors in punctuation etc. .
Referencing is almost always correct. |
Usually follows required practices for presentation, but with some issues to be addressed. A number of typos, errors in punctuation etc.
Referencing is generally correct.
|
Has not followed required presentational conventions
Many typos, errors in punctuation etc.
Many errors in referencing.
|
Poor presentation adversely affects intelligibility
Many typos, errors in punctuation etc.
No use of conventions in referencing.
|
MARK:
LECTURER’S SIGNATURE:
DATE:13/4/2015
Comment:
Mohammed ,
I am confused. Your report in to the ‘ EFFECTIVE PEDAGOGIES TO TEACH ENGLISH READING SKILLS TO A COHORT OF YEAR SEVEN SAUDI ARABIAN STUDENTS’ appears as if it has already been conducted. You write in the past tense and provide ‘data’ from what appears to be a completed study. Is this a past investigation you have conducted? The gaol of this assignment is to construct a question to be investigated and demonstrate reading and consideration of methodology prior to commencing the project. I have struggled to ‘mark’ this work and I have marked your work according to the criteria for this assignment but I am concerned that this is work taken from previous study. I am interested to hear in what context and for what purpose this investigation was conducted and when. A requirement of this degree is that work submitted be original. Can we please discuss this assignment when we next meet.
Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.