Posted: December 3rd, 2013

âExpand your critical reading on Le Corbusier with defence of your critical position and your depts to other critics.â

Description: Hello, I am going to send you my introduction that will contain my general views in critical architecture. I would like for you to continue the essay from
that point and start talking more specifically about Le Corbusier‘s manifesto and criticism. The critics that we are going to base this essay on are: 1.
Nikolaus Pevsner: (Pioneers of Modern Design: From William Morris to Walter Gropius, Penguin Books, first edition 1939. Fourth edition 1974). 2. Reyner
Banham: (Theory and Design in the First Machine Age, Butterworth Architecture Press, first edition 1960. Second edition 1962). 3. Charles Jencks:
(Modern Movements in Architecture, Penguin Books, first edition 1973. Second edition, 1985). 4. Kenneth Frampton: (Modern Architecture: A Critical
Theory, Thames and Hudson. First edition 1980. Third edition 1992). I can provide you with the material of the study books (if needed) stated below
except from: 1. Le Corbusier: Towards an Architecture 2. Le Corbusier: Talks with students Furthermore, in the structure of the essay i would like to
include the description of the views of the four critics on Le Corbusier. We can also compare and contrast their opinions and group them if they have
similar conclusions. The further purpose of this essay is to rate the architect from 1-10 in the conclusion based on our critical position. I want to be in
favour of Le Corb but also thoughtful and critical about him. Maybe more of a Jencks’ style of critic. PLEASE PLEASE add footnotes as their use is very
important for the essay! I am going to send you a part of the introduction in the next few hours. If you need anything please contact me ASAP as I am in
a hurry! feel free to use any illustrations! Thank you in advance, I am waiting for your reply Regards
Click here for more on this paper>>>>