Posted: September 13th, 2017

AIDs in the Workplace

AIDs in the Workplace

CA SE 8.1 AID S in the Workplace
CARLA LOMBARD AL WAY S WOR KED WELL WITH people. So when she opened her Better Bagels bagel shop

seven years ago, she anticipated that managing her employ-ees would be the easy part. She had worked

for enough different bosses that she thought she knew what it took to be a good employer. Whether she

was up to the financial side of running a business was her worry. As it turned out, however, Better Bagels

flourished. Not only did Carla go on to open three smaller branches of Better Bagels, but her bakery also

made daily wholesale deliveries to dozens of cof-fee shops and restaurants around the city. No, the

business was prospering. It was just that the personnel issues turned out to be more difficult than she

had ever expected. Take this week, for example. On Tuesday, Carla was in the main bagel shop when

around noon Tom Walters’s ex- wife, Frances, came in. Tom oversaw a lot of the early- morning baking at

that shop and like most of Carla’s employees put in his share of time work-ing the sales counter. He was

a good worker, and Carla had been considering promoting him next month to manager of one of the

branch shops. After ordering a bagel, Frances took Carla aside. She beat around the bush for a few

minutes before she got to her point, because she was there to tell Carla that Tom had AIDS. Frances said

she was telling Carla because she “ always liked her and thought she was entitled to know because she

was Tom’s employer.” Carla barely knew Frances, and she was so taken aback that she was at a loss for

words. She was shocked and embarrassed and didn’t know whether she should even discuss Tom with

Frances. While Carla was still trying to recover herself, Frances took her bagel and left. Carla was still

concerned and upset when she saw Tom the next day. Perhaps he had been thinner and looked tired

more often the last few months, Carla thought to herself. But she couldn’t be sure, and Tom seemed to

be his usual upbeat self. Carla wanted to discuss Frances’s visit with Tom, but she couldn’t bring herself

to mention it. She had always liked Tom, but— face it, she thought— he’s my employee, not my friend.

And it’s his business. If I were an employee, I wouldn’t want my boss asking me about my health. Later,

however, she began to wonder if it wasn’t her business after all. She overheard some customers saying

that people were staying away from the local Denny’s fran-chise because one of its cooks was reported

to have AIDS. The rumor was that some of his fellow employees had even circulated a petition saying

that the cook should go, but a local AIDS support group had intervened, threatening legal action. So the

cook was staying, but the customers weren’t. Carla knew something about AIDS and thought some of

what her customers were saying was bigoted and ill informed. She was pretty sure that you couldn’t

transmit HIV through food— including bagel— preparation, but she thought that maybe she should

double- check her informa-tion. But what was really beginning to worry her were the business

implications. She didn’t want a Denny’s- like situ-ation at Better Bagels, but in her customers’ comments

she could see the possibility of something like that happen-ing once the word got out about Tom,

especially if she made him a manager. Carla was running a business, and even if her customers’ fears

might be irrational or exagger-ated, she couldn’t force them to visit her shops or eat her bagels. Carla

knew it was illegal to fire Tom for having AIDS, and in any case that’s not the kind of person she was. But

she couldn’t afford to skirt the whole problem, she realized, as some large companies do, by simply

sending the employee home at full pay. To be sure, doing that deprives the employee of meaningful

work, but it removes any difficulties in the workplace, and the employee has no legal grounds for com-

plaint if he or she is left on the payroll. And then, of course, there was always the question of Tom’s

future work perform-ance. Putting the question of promotion aside, if he really was ill, as Frances had

said, his work performance would proba-bly decline, she thought. Shouldn’t she begin developing some

plan for dealing with that? Update Frances was misinformed. Tom didn’t have AIDS. He had developed

multiple sclerosis, a degenerative disease of the central nervous system. It’s not fatal, but the course of

the disease is unpredictable. Attacks can occur at any time and then fade away. A person can feel fine

one day, only to have an attack the next day that causes blurred vision, slurred speech, numbness, or

even blindness and paralysis. Tom was never worried about losing his job, and he was pretty sure he

could continue to perform well at it, maybe even move higher in the business either with Carla or with

another employer. But he kept his condition to himself, hiding his symptoms and covering up occasional

absences and trips to the doctor, because he was worried that customers and col-leagues would

perceive him differently. He didn’t want looks of pity if he stumbled or constant questions about how he

was feeling.

DISCU SSION QUE STIONS
1. What are the moral issues in this case? What ideals, obligations, and consequences must Carla

Lombard consider? What rights, if any, are at stake? Will it make a difference whether Carla adopts a

Kantian approach or a utilitarian approach to this situation?
2. Would it be wrong of Carla to ask Tom Walters about his health? Why or why not? Defend your answer

by appeal to moral principle.
3. Suppose Tom had AIDS. What should Carla do? Is an employee’s HIV status a job- related issue? In par-

ticular, is it a factor Carla should consider in deciding whether to promote Tom? What part, if any,

should the attitudes of Tom’s coworkers play in Carla’s decision? 4
. How should companies address the problem of public fear and prejudice when employees with AIDS

have direct contact with customers?
5. Should companies develop programs or policies that deal specifically with AIDS? If so, what

characteris-tics should they have? Or should they deal with the problem only on a case- by- case basis?

Should large corporations develop AIDS- awareness programs? Or should AIDS be treated no differently

than any other disease?
6. Does Tom have a moral obligation to disclose his medical condition to Carla— and, if so, at what

point? Suppose a job applicant has a chronic, potentially debilitating medical condition. Should he or

she reveal that fact before being hired? Would it be wrong not to mention the disease if the interviewer

inquires about the applicant’s health?

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂