Posted: December 18th, 2014

Analyse the significance of the decision of the European Court of Justice in the joined cases of Keck and Mithouard C-267/91 and C-268/91

Analyse the significance of the decision of the European Court of Justice in the joined cases of Keck and Mithouard C-267/91 and C-268/91

Order Description

Before discussing the case you should explain the relevant area of law. This may include brief reference to earlier cases in the field.
You are expected to read the judgment of the Court of Justice and to find academic comment on it.
You should explain the facts and the decision in Keck.
In order to analyse the significance of the decision you can mention cases that have been overruled and/or confirmed by the decision in Keck. You can also include

reference to subsequent cases which shed light on the decision in Keck.
The coursework should be written in essay style.
See LAF school marking criteria for generic guidance on expectations.

Quantitative restrictions are currently covered by article 34 TFEU

It was article 28 of the EC Treaty (1999-2009)

It was article 30 in the original EEC treaty (1957-1999) when Keck was decide

Must Be OSCOLA Referenced.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂