Posted: September 13th, 2017

Article Critique: Pro-Growth Tax Reform

Article Critique: Pro-Growth Tax Reform

Title: Analysis of ‘A Pro-Family, Pro-Growth Tax Reform’

Our writers can complete your paper. Follow this link now

Introduction
Critique of journal undertakes vital and pivotal role towards communicating precise information and educating learners (Hersch, Coffey, & Lamport, 2011). Besides, it gives more insight to what is happening in the real world. For instance, Wall Street Journal published the ‘A Pro-Family, Pro-Growth Tax Reform’ journal. The article discusses income tax and how it affects the family. This paper seeks to give a critical and give responses
Discussion
Summary of the Journal
‘A Pro-Family, Pro-Growth Tax Reform’ by Mike Lee and Marco was published 22nd Sept, 2014. It bases its intellect on understanding taxes and its effects on the income they receive. Lee and Rubio assert that the typical U.S. inhabitants continue to suffer due to the high cost of living. However, they also point to a fundamental transformation rather that a downturn in the economy of the U.S. Despite all the above glitches the practices and policies are still intact since the 20th century. The structures that are obliged to review tax systems in the U.S. prove to be dysfunctional and antiquated. Furthermore, the two assert that the tax codes are higher than anticipated. Consequently, they prove to be unfair to the families trapped in poverty. The journal also pinpoints how parents are crying foul over, double charged for the federal programs targeted for senior entitlement (Bankman, Griffith, & Pratt, 2008). Consequently, the two scholars propose that the government proffers a level playing field in that it reduces the key taxes that bother both the middle-income earners and the lower earners. Besides, they recommend tax reliefs for low earning families. Since, this will ensure that the lower income earners also have a chance not only to indulge in family matters but invest in commerce aspects. Consequently, the two scholars endeavor to ensure functionality of the tax laws, policies and principles, as well as spearhead for more reforms (Cockfield, 2011). In conclusion, the two scholars seek to ensure that all Americans secure jobs and finances to start businesses at ease. This steps will ensure an increase in income hence more returns from income taxes.

Response
According to Lasser Institute (2007) payment of taxes is mandatory. Moreover, it is a citizen’s obligation to pay tax in the world (Campbell, 2012). In this regard, working citizens should appreciate paying taxes. It is through taxes that most governments raise their immense revenue. It is used to provide healthcare services, infrastructure, security, paying wages of public servants and development (Arnett, 2010). As a result, the country can run its daily activities. The above facilitation reflects back to the citizens by ensuring improved quality of life. Reasonably, income taxes are influential in the tax codes. Therefore, paying of taxes by the households should be perceived positively.
Although Lee and Rubio’s suggestion turnout to law for a few years, the same scenario would steer back to ambiguities and distinctive interests safeguarding their “mystic.” Likewise, providing that the government continues to tax income, particularly with one-offs and credits still the citizens will remain to lag and sell their offspring into financial captivity.
Conclusion
Journal criticism is an imperative learning strategy to learners. It enables learners to acquire different points of view. Therefore, developing critical analysis of matters. Likewise, it proffers definite information. For instance, in the analysis of the above journal, one can comprehend the full context of income tax, effects it has to the economy and citizens at large. Therefore, I recommend that teachers employ more use of the above technique.