Posted: September 16th, 2017

Article Reviews;http://lynn-lang.student.lynn.edu:2446/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=fb455f30-3fa3-465d-ad7c-0a4d6f04e9cd%40sessionmgr4002

Article Reviews;http://lynn-lang.student.lynn.edu:2446/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=fb455f30-3fa3-465d-ad7c-0a4d6f04e9cd%40sessionmgr4002

Article Link:

http://lynn-lang.student.lynn.edu:2446/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=fb455f30-3fa3-465d-ad7c-0a4d6f04e9cd%40sessionmgr4002

Instructions:

Scholarly Article Reviews: (25% of total grade)
Based on the week’s reading, you will do a literature search for a scholarly article (either conceptual, empirical, or theoretical) that is related (“connected”) to the selected reading. There will be two (2) for the course. Choose a scholarly article by conducting a Proquest search. A scholarly article should contain a sample and study of that population. Typically, scholarly articles begin with a review of the literature and then set forth hypotheses to be tested. A study will then be conducted to support (or not support as the case may be) the hypotheses discussed. Conclusions will be drawn and recommendations for further research will also be suggested. If you would like me to tell you if your chosen article is scholarly or not, please feel free to email me the article before conducting your review.
These article reviews are not summaries but rather a review in the sense of a critical analysis and the opportunity to synthesize with the reading and other assignments, e.g., your own research for the course project. You are to integrate this review (your findings and analyses) in your assigned reading/chapter. The article must have been published since 2005 (2006 to the present). On the cover page, the bibliographic information should be in proper format (APA style), your name, course (MBA 628), and date of submission. Beginning on the second page, you should state: (1) how the article relates (synthesize) to the material being studied (textbook) and (2) with what you agree and disagree, stating why (using analytical and critical thinking skills). The review should be at least two (2) pages (singled-spaced, 1” margins, Times New Roman and 12-point font), plus the title page. There should be a reasonable balance between these two sections, e.g., 40% (or 60%) relating the article to the text and 60% (then 40%) critical analysis, if not equal balance (50%-50%). In addition, if quotation(s) is (are) used, then that much additional review is required; hence, the completed pages are your views, opinions, understanding, and writing. You must attach a copy of the article or the link to your article to your review/critique. Only full scholarly articles (no abstracts, book or article summaries, etc.) will be accepted.
Each article review should be posted on the Discussion Board for that respective week along with the link to the actual article. Other class members are expected to participate by discussing and sharing their perspectives, thoughts, analyses, and synthesis about the presented articles and (text) assignment. Each student must respond in a minimum of two paragraphs to at least two other students’ article reviews. If the criteria are not followed, the assignment will be evaluated accordingly, e.g., one page written review instead of two, then loss of 50% of the assignment value or three areas covered in the review instead of the required four, then loss of 25%.
Submit each Scholarly Article Review to the Discussion Forum by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time of the respective week. Reply to at least two of your peers’ article reviews by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time of the respective week.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂