Essay

Would you be able to review and grade your own assignments for this course with total objectivity? Even when it comes to someone else’s work, could you remove yourself from your own values and leave behind your biases while critiquing it? It might prove to be a harder task then you think. However, sociologists are expected to adhere to a certain code of ethics that require them to remain value neutral when conducting research. They have a moral obligation to the public to remain value free especially in cases that might have far reaching consequences affecting the whole of the society. Still, the principles in the code of ethics are only guidelines and rely on the individual scientist to stick to them as closely as possible. In this Discussion, you will debate the probability of scientists in the field of sociology remaining value natural in their research and describe some of the ways biased work might impact society as a whole. To prepare for this Discussion: •Review pages 39 – 43 in your course textbook on ethics of research. •Consider the difference between qualitative and quantitative research. •Review and reflect on the historical and current research examples presented in Chapters 1 and 2 of your course textbook that ran counter to previously accepted beliefs. •Explore the American Sociological Association Web site’s Code of Ethics section at http://www.asanet.org/about/ethics.cfm •Reflect on the role of sociologists in goverment, developing public policy alternatives based on their research. With these thoughts in mind: Post by Day 3 your responses to the following questions: •Do you think it is possible for any scientist to be totally objective and value neutral when conducting research? Why or why not? •How might the answer differ for qualitative and quantitative research? •When the value neutrality of research is questionable what is the potential impact on society?

Would you be able to review and grade your own assignments for this course with total objectivity? Even when it comes to someone else’s work, could you remove yourself from your own values and leave behind your biases while critiquing it? It might prove to be a harder task then you think. However, sociologists are expected to adhere to a certain code of ethics that require them to remain value neutral when conducting research. They have a moral obligation to the public to remain value free especially in cases that might have far reaching consequences affecting the whole of the society. Still, the principles in the code of ethics are only guidelines and rely on the individual scientist to stick to them as closely as possible. In this Discussion, you will debate the probability of scientists in the field of sociology remaining value natural in their research and describe some of the ways biased work might impact society as a whole.

To prepare for this Discussion:

•Review pages 39 – 43 in your course textbook on ethics of research.

•Consider the difference between qualitative and quantitative research.

•Review and reflect on the historical and current research examples presented in Chapters 1 and 2 of your course textbook that ran counter to previously accepted beliefs.

•Explore the American Sociological Association Web site’s Code of Ethics section at http://www.asanet.org/about/ethics.cfm

•Reflect on the role of sociologists in goverment, developing public policy alternatives based on their research.

With these thoughts in mind:

Post by Day 3 your responses to the following questions:

•Do you think it is possible for any scientist to be totally objective and value neutral when conducting research? Why or why not?

•How might the answer differ for qualitative and quantitative research?

•When the value neutrality of research is questionable what is the potential impact on society?

Continue to order Get a quote

Order a unique copy of this paper

Type of paper

Academic level

Deadline

Pages (550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.