| Presentation of assignment 5 % |
| Disorganised/ incoherent
0points |
Includes cover page Shows some attempt to organise in a logical manner Includes an Introduction, Body and Conclusion
1.25points |
Shows organisation and coherence. Includes an Introduction, Body and Conclusion
2.5points |
Carefully and logically Organised. Includes an Introduction, Body and Conclusion
3.75points |
Shows a polished and imaginative approach to the topic. Includes an Abstract, Introduction, Body and Conclusion
5points |
|
| Clarity of expression (incl. accuracy, spelling, grammar, punctuation 5% |
| Meaning unclear and/or grammar and/or spelling contain frequent errors
0points |
Meaning apparent but language not always fluent Grammar and/or spelling contain errors
1.25points |
Language mainly fluent Grammar and spelling mainly accurate
2.5points |
Language fluent Grammar and spelling accurate
3.75points |
Fluent writing style appropriate to document. Grammar and spelling accurate.
5points |
|
| Attention to purpose and conforming to instructions (e.g. word length). 5% |
| Fails to address the task set
0points |
Some of the work is focused on the aims and themes of the assignment
1.25points |
Has addressed the main purpose of the assignment
2.5points |
Deviates slightly from the required parameters. Has addressed the purpose of the assignment coherently and with some attempt to demonstrate imagination.
3.75points |
Work has been submitted within prescribed parameters. Has addressed the purpose of the assignment comprehensively and Imaginatively.
5points |
|
| Knowledge of theory Content and range.: 4.1 Gaining an understanding of the nature of entrepreneurship and its role in business. 4.2 Demonstrate an understanding of entrepreneurial behaviour including approaches to teamwork, communication, creativity, innovation, risk-taking and ethical responsibility. 50% Do not use direct quotes to be used in this review. |
| Lacks evidence of knowledge relevant to the topic and/or significantly misuses terminology
0points |
Evidence of limited knowledge of topic and some use of appropriate terminology Inaccurate or inappropriate choice of theory
1.25points |
Evidence of limited knowledge of topic and some use of appropriate terminology Inaccurate or inappropriate choice of theory
2.5points |
Reasonable knowledge of topic and an awareness of a variety of ideas/contexts /frame-works Insightful and appropriate selection of theory in key areas. Most key theories are included in the work in an appropriate straight forward manner
3.75points |
Comprehensive/detailed knowledge of topic with areas of specialisation is depth and awareness of provisional nature of knowledge. Assignment demonstrates integration and innovation in the selection and handling of theory
5points |
|
| Analysis and Synthesis 15% |
| Fail to analyse. No organisation of ideas and information
0points |
Can analyse a limited range of information with guidance using classification/principles. Partially collects/collates and categorises information in a structured way
1.25points |
Can analyse with guidance using given classification / principles. Can collect/collate and categorise ideas and information in a predictable and standard format
2.5points |
Can analyse a range of information with minimum guidance, can apply major theories and compare alternative methods/techniques for obtaining data. Can reformat a range of ideas/information towards a given purpose
3.75points |
Can analyse new and/or abstract data and situations without guidance using a wide range of techniques appropriate to the topic. With minimum guidance can transform abstract data and concepts towards a given purpose and can design novel solutions
5points |
|
| Introductions and Conclusions 10% |
| Unsubstantiated/invalid conclusions based on anecdote and generalisation only, or no conclusions at all.
0points |
Limited evidence of findings and conclusions supported by theory/literature
1.25points |
Evidence of findings and conclusions grounded in theory/literature
2.5points |
Good development shown in summary of arguments based in theory/ literature
3.75points |
Analytical and clear conclusions well-grounded in theory and literature showing development of new concepts
5points |
|
| Referencing 10% |
| Fails reference
0points |
Minimal attempt at referencing
1.25points |
A few errors
2.5points |
Minimal errors
3.75points |
No errors in referencing
5points |
|
