Posted: March 31st, 2015

In Ferson Contractors Ltd v Levolux AT Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 11, the Court of Appeal stated that ‘the character of s.108 Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 was ‘draconian’ (‘harsh, severe, cruel’). The process is swift and an effective means of resolving disputes and, where the adjudicator is wrong, the matter can be corrected in subsequent arbitration or litigation. According to HHJ Coulson QC’s description in Harlow & Milner Ltd v Mrs Linda Teasdale [2006] EWHC 1708 (TCC), this can lead to ‘clear but sometimes harsh consequences’

Question of the course work

In Ferson Contractors Ltd v Levolux AT Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 11, the Court of Appeal stated that ‘the character of s.108 Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 was ‘draconian’ (‘harsh, severe, cruel’). The process is swift and an effective means of resolving disputes and, where the adjudicator is wrong, the matter can be corrected in subsequent arbitration or litigation. According to HHJ Coulson QC’s description in Harlow & Milner Ltd v Mrs Linda Teasdale [2006] EWHC 1708 (TCC), this can lead to ‘clear but sometimes harsh consequences’.

Is this assessment of the introduction of adjudication still correct?

For a custom paper on the above case, place your order now!

What We Offer:

• On-time delivery guarantee

• PhD-level writers

• Automatic plagiarism check

• 100% money-back guarantee

• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality

• High Quality custom-written papers