Posted: March 3rd, 2014

Inadequate understanding of the subject in terms of knowledge, skills and application. Minimal reading and inadequate planning.

• Inadequate understanding of the subject in terms of knowledge, skills and application. Minimal reading and inadequate planning.
• Little understanding of underlying principles and concepts, and no effective analysis.
• Reflective statements provide an incomplete or inaccurate description of the task, with no evidence of effective collaboration with others.
• Work failed for one or more of the following: non-submission, academic misconduct, answering a different question from the one asked, poor or incoherent vocabulary, no evidence of correct scholarly referencing.

Fail (NN) 30-49%

Deficient work – showing evidence of the following:

• Lack of academic rigour, with material that is incomplete or irrelevant.
• Little evidence of knowledge of the relevant body of knowledge to make a persuasive case.
• Failure to review critically, analyse, consolidate and combine knowledge and draw relevant conclusions.
• Reflective statements provide a basic description of the task with no insight into behaviour or learning preferences for collaborative practice.
• Does not demonstrate sufficient grasp of the required scholarly standards in relation to presentation, with errors, bad spelling or grammar, lack of organisation, insufficient arguments.
• Improper citation of sources and referencing of work.
• Late submission.

Pass (PA) 50 –59%

Satisfactory work – showing evidence of the following:

• The subject is covered satisfactorily but the volume of reading is insufficient for Credit.
• Reasonable coverage of the relevant body of knowledge but does not review critically, analyse, consolidate with a high level of insight.
• Factual and descriptive rather than carefully argued and analytical style of work. Lacks evidence of intellectual independence to adapt knowledge in diverse contexts.
• Conclusions are limited in scope.
• Reflective statements provide a nuanced insight into behaviour and learning preferences and practice in collaboration with others.
• English, including spelling, grammar, vocabulary, and communication style is competent and coherent
• Only minor lapses in referencing and/or use of sources.
• Work is not well organised or structured.

Credit (CR) 60 – 69%

Good work – showing evidence of the following:

• Broad understanding of the subject or area of practice and has read widely.
• Volume of reading of sufficient breadth and depth for a competent understanding of main issues, underlying principles and concepts but without the comprehensiveness of higher grades.
• Well-developed skills to present critical arguments and competent use of theoretical and technical knowledge with depth in some areas.
• Displays competence in reviewing critically, analysing, consolidating and synthesising the various cases made within a body of knowledge.
• Coherent arguments supported by evidence and illustration from the work of other authorities or by direct empirical analysis, but without the intellectual independence found in the higher grades.
• The work is clearly structured and the exposition of knowledge and ideas is clear and competent.
• Reflective statements provide a thoughtful commentary on the task, learning and relationships with others, ability to critically evaluate relevant theories, but without the self- awareness and self-questioning found in higher grades.
• Clear, coherent and interesting presentation, with responsibility and accountability to deal with questions and criticisms well.
• English, including spelling, grammar, vocabulary, and/or use of sources, and communication style is good.
• Work is fully referenced according to accepted scholarly standards.

Distinction (DI) 70 – 79%

Excellent work – showing evidence of the following:

• Demonstrates a comprehensive knowledge of the subject.
• Material is deployed in a disciplined way with sophisticated comprehension of key issues
• Demonstrated ability to critically review, analyse, synthesise and apply theoretical and technical body knowledge in a broad range of areas and diverse contexts.
• Shows reasoning and creative skills to use knowledge and awareness to exercise critical thinking and judgement in selecting and applying methods and technologies in identifying and solving problems with intellectual independence
• The work is clearly structured and convincingly supported by appropriate evidence, argument or illustration.
• Reflective statements provide a thoughtful commentary on the task with insights into learning and interaction.
• Demonstrates critical evaluation and analysis of relevant theories as a basis for independent lifelong learning.
• Extremely solid, thorough, comprehensive written work, with a high level of academic integrity but without great originality.

High Distinction (HD) 80 – 100%

Exceptional work – showing evidence of the following:

• Highly original or insightful work.
• Evidence of formulated and sustained arguments with sophisticated analysis, inferences, synthesis of material and identifying flaws in published work.
• Could not be improved at this learning

• You Want A Similar Paper Done? Don’t be stressed, Click Here To Order this essay!!!