Posted: December 3rd, 2014

International banking and finance law

International banking and finance law

Order Description

Module Name: International Banking and Finance Law

LLM ASSESSMENT COURSEWORK 2014/2015

Coursework must be submitted in MS Word format. All work must be word processed in 12 point font Times New Roman or Ariel and double spaced.

Please ensure that you provide the following details on the first page of your coursework:
Student Number
Module Name and Number
Coursework question
Word count

WORD LIMIT – 3500 words (maximum)

The word limit does not include footnotes, appendices or bibliography. Footnotes must be used for references only. Any narrative or description contained within footnotes or appendices will be disregarded by the marker. References must be made in OSCOLA format. (Oxford Standard for Citation of Legal Authorities)

The following rules apply to word limits for the coursework assessment:
a. Word count includes everything in the main body of the text (including headings, tables, citations, quotes, lists, etc.).
b. The references, footnotes (provided footnotes only include references) and bibliography are NOT included in the word count.
c. There is no penalty for exceeding the word count but the marker WILL stop reading once the word limit has been reached and nothing further will be taken into account in the allocation of marks. Therefore students will be penalised for a failure to be concise and for failing to conclude their work appropriately.
d. The word count needs to be clearly and correctly stated on the title page of the assignment. Incorrectly understating the word count constitutes an assessment offence and may result in further action.

QUESTION(S):

1. Critically analyse the impact of the Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (2012) against financial crime.

References must be made in OSCOLA format

Feel free to use appropriate number of references

Marking Criteria

Grading Scale: Distinction 70% Merit 60% Pass 50%

1. Ability to identify key concepts and legal issues relevant to the question
For example; recognition of the parameters of the task (the legal and contextual issues), rationale for the prioritisation of certain issues, clear and logical structure to the response and close correlation between question and response. (Fulfilment of these criteria will usually be evidenced in the introduction).

2. Understanding and accuracy of legal content
For example; relevant primary and secondary legal sources identified accurately, ability to summarise and explain the law and communicate doctrinal arguments succinctly rather than by extensive quotation from statutes or cases.

3. Critical analysis, evaluation and synthesis
For example; evidences a capacity to identify complexity and uncertainty in the law, to examine and appraise the comparative merits of different legal arguments advanced by others (evidence of wider reading) assess proposals for reform, and to recognise contextual arguments relevant to the question. To reach conclusions that are summative, logical and persuasive (i.e. based on the analysis and evaluation presented).

4. Originality and creativity
For example; evidences an ability to independently appraise the knowledge base in order to identify new problems or areas for investigation, develop new perspectives or solutions for existing legal problems.

5. Research process and presentation
For example; clarity of expression, syntax, spelling, ability to follow legal conventions for citation and referencing of sources, and a complete bibliography and table of cases/statutory instruments.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂