Posted: September 14th, 2017

Low Pay at Weight Watchers Stirs Protest as Stars Rake It In Custom Essay

identify an ethical question raised by the item and identify a real or imagined person at the subject

company that has to resolve the issue. (Your focus should be on the ethical decision-making process that led to a

decision that is the focus of the selected item); (2) identify at least two options the real or imagined person

at the subject company has to resolve the issue (Note: the decision maker should be a businessman or woman not a

government figure, not a consumer, and not the company as a whole. For example, if you choose the ?Name Blacked

Out? article, the decision-maker should not be a doctor or an official with the Food and Drug Administration. If

you choose the ?Underage Garment Workers? article, the decision-maker should not be a worker in the garment

factory. If you choose the ?On Campus, New Deals with Banks? article, the decision-maker should not be a

university official or student); (3) discuss how the ethical question should be resolved using one of the

following theories: utilitarianism (greatest net benefit for greatest number); or Rawls? justice theory (duty to

focus on interests of the least advantaged for purpose of obtaining justice); or (Nozick?s Rights Theory (absence

of fraud and force); or virtue ethics (whether the decision would reflect well on my character based on the

values of my professional peers, the values of ethical role models, and if the decision appeared in the press);

or objectivism (a rationally selfish decision that results neither in sacrificing myself to others nor others to

myself); or the ethic of care (focus on actions that preserve the web of relationships close to the decision-

maker)). You should state a bottom line resolution to the question you address.

You are strongly encouraged to review the video segments in Block 3 and the video segment on virtue ethics in

Block 4 so that you have some understanding of all of the possible approaches to addressing the ethical dilemma

on which you choose to focus.

The most important part of the essay is the solid application of the ethical principle to the facts as you have

presented them. Creativity in presenting your ideas in the essay, however, such as the incorporation of

believable fictional characters in the context of the situation raised in the item, or describing the imagined

ethical analysis of a real person in the item, also will be rewarded. No further reading on the item you select

is required. Also, you need not resolve the ethical question you select (some of the articles present more than

one ethical question, but your essay should focus on only one) in the same way as the decision-maker featured in

the article.

Please type the essay single-spaced. The essay should be no longer than 350 words. That is plenty of words, give

or take 75 or so words, to complete this assignment properly.

In that regard, please do not begin the essay with an introductory paragraph summarizing the article or the

points you are about to make in the essay. No matter how long or short such an introductory paragraph may be, it

will be a waste of words. I have read all of the articles and, since I will be the only one reading the essay,

you may assume knowledge of the article and the topic.

There is no one right format for the essay, but those essays that have earned the highest score in the past

generally have fallen into one of three formats: (1) a narrative with dialogue among participants in the

decision-making process (the format you chose, which is fine); (2) a skit; (3) an interior monologue where the

decision-maker in effect carries on a conversation with himself or herself about the ethical implications of a

decision dialogue facing him or her. Each of these formats lends itself to getting inside the head of the

decision-maker as the decision-making process is unfolding and that is what I really want.