Posted: September 16th, 2017

Most southerners defended slavery, even though they were not part of the "Plantation Aristocracy." Discuss why they supported slavery, and your response to the claims made by its supporters, and explain why it was easier to end the slave trade t

Order Description
-slavery itself. (end from paper topic)
analyze and discuss primary and secondary sources that relate to the institution of slavery in the United States.
two full pages
sources listed
no Wikipedia
at least two quotes in essay
discussion is based off the readings/links.
<p style=”position: absolute; top: -999em;”><img src=”//sa.bbc.co.uk/bbc/bbc/s?name=SET-COUNTER&amp;app_type=web&amp;ml_name=SSI&amp;ml_version=0.21.0&amp;language=en-GB&amp;blq_s=2.8d&amp;blq_r=2.7&amp;blq_v=default-domestic” height=”1″ width=”1″ alt=””></p>
Cookies on the BBC website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we’ll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the BBC website. However, if you would like to, you can change your cookie settings at any time.
• Continue
• Find out more
British Broadcasting Corporation
Accessibility links
• Skip to content
• Skip to local navigation
• Skip to bbc.co.uk navigation
• Skip to bbc.co.uk search
• Accessibility Help
This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Find out more about page archiving.
History
• Ancient History
• British History
• World Wars
• Historic Figures
• Family History
• Hands on History
• History for Kids
• On This Day
British Anti-slavery
By Dr John Oldfield
Last updated 2011-02-17

In the space of just 46 years, the British government outlawed the slave trade that Britain had created and went on to abolish the practice of slavery throughout the colonies. John Oldfield shows how this national campaign became one of the most successful reform movements of the 19th century.
On this page
• Introduction
• Abolishing the slave trade
• Extending the campaign
• The Anti-Slavery Society
• Foreign anti-slavery
• Find out more
Page options
Introduction
British anti-slavery was one of the most important reform movements of the 19th century. But its history is not without ironies. During the course of the 18th century the British perfected the Atlantic slave system. Indeed, it has been estimated that between 1700 and 1810 British merchants transported almost three million Africans across the Atlantic. That the British benefited from the Atlantic slave system is indisputable. Yet, paradoxically, it was also the British who led the struggle to bring this system to an end.
The history of British anti-slavery can be divided into a number of distinct phases. The first of these stretched from 1787 to 1807 and was directed against the slave trade. Of course, there had been initiatives before this date. The Quakers, for instance, petitioned Parliament against the slave trade as early as 1783 and a similar petition was submitted in 1785, this time from the inhabitants of Bridgwater in Somerset. But by and large these were piecemeal efforts, involving a relatively small number of people. It was the Society for the Abolition of the Slave Trade, organised in May 1787, which set the movement on its modern course, evolving a structure and organisation that made it possible to mobilise thousands of Britons.
Top
Abolishing the slave trade
Thomas Clarkson © The Society for the Abolition of the Slave Trade or, to be more precise, the Society’s guiding London Committee, was the prototype of the 19th-century reform organisation. Its self-appointed task was to create a constituency for British anti-slavery through the distribution of abolitionist books, pamphlets, prints and artefacts. The Committee also had its own network of local contacts (‘agents’ and ‘country committees’) scattered across the length and breadth of the country. And, finally, there was Thomas Clarkson, a sort of ‘travelling agent’, who provided a vital link between London and the provinces, organising committees, distributing tracts and offering advice and encouragement to hundreds of grass-roots activists.
These different activities culminated in two nationwide petition campaigns. In the first of these, in 1788, over 100 petitions attacking the slave trade were presented to the House of Commons in the space of just three months. The campaign of 1792 was more ambitious still. In all, 519 petitions were presented to the Commons, the largest number ever submitted to the House on a single subject or in a single session, but just as important as the size of the campaign was its range and diversity. While the industrial north provided the most enthusiastic support for abolition, every English county was represented in 1792, in addition to which Scotland and Wales made significant contributions.
Through the means of mass petitioning William Wilberforce, who led the campaign in the Commons, hoped to exert pressure on Parliament to abolish the slave trade. The strategy almost worked; in 1792 the House resolved by 230 votes to 85 that the trade ought to be gradually abolished. But petitioning on this scale was always likely to cause alarm in the minds of men with one eye on events in France. Ultimately, radicalism was to prove the Achilles heel of the early abolitionist movement. The rising tide of revolutionary violence in France and, with it, the growth of political reaction at home, inevitably took its toll. In 1793 the Commons refused to revive the subject of the slave trade, effectively reversing the resolutions of the previous year.
Top
Extending the campaign
Ironically, however, war in Europe helped to prepare the way for final victory. The acquisition of new territories in the West Indies, notably Trinidad, Berbice, and Demerara, led many of the old planter élite, who were increasingly fearful of competition, to desert the anti-abolitionist ranks. Capitalising on this change of heart and the entry into Parliament of a batch of new liberal Irish MPs, the abolitionists in 1804 renewed their campaign. In 1805 a Bill providing for the abolition of the slave trade to conquered territories triumphantly passed both Houses. The following year this was superseded by a stronger measure that outlawed the British Atlantic slave trade altogether.
After 1807 British anti-slavery entered a new phase. The Society for the Abolition of the Slave Trade gave way to the African Institution, whose principal aim was to ensure that the new legislation was enforced and that other countries followed Britain’s example. The first of these objectives was soon realised. Persuading other countries to join Britain in outlawing the slave trade proved more difficult, however. Despite the efforts of the African Institution, and those of British ministers, the Congresses of Paris (1814) and Vienna (1815) both failed to reach specific agreement, not least because of French opposition. The results of the Aix la Chapelle Congress in 1818 were equally unsatisfactory.
The failure of the British to sway foreign powers forced abolitionists to rethink their ideas. So, too, did reports from the West Indies which suggested that conditions on the plantations had hardly improved since 1807. The situation seemed to call for more direct action, namely an attack on the institution of slavery itself.
Top
The Anti-Slavery Society
An anti-slavery meeting in Exeter Hall, London © In 1823 some of the leading members of the African Institution, including, Clarkson, Wilberforce, and Zachary Macaulay, organised a new body, the Anti-Slavery Society. Modest in its ambitions, at least by later standards, the Anti-Slavery Society called for the adoption of measures to improve slave conditions in the West Indies, together with a plan for gradual emancipation leading ultimately to complete freedom.
Like the Society for the Abolition of the Slave Trade, the Anti-Slavery Society was a national organisation with its own network of local and regional auxiliaries. And like earlier organisations, its leaders endorsed mass petitioning. In fact, between 1828 and 1830 Parliament was deluged by over 5000 petitions calling for the gradual abolition (and mitigation) of slavery. But progress in the Commons was slow and halting. Finally, in 1831 some of the Anti-Slavery Society’s younger and more radical elements organised the Agency Committee (which formally separated from the parent body in 1832). Revivalist in tone, the Agency Committee took abolition out into the country. More controversially, it also committed itself to the unconditional and immediate abolition of slavery.
For obvious reasons, the Agency Committee was ideally placed to exploit the struggle over the reform of Parliament and to win over voters newly enfranchised by the Reform Act of 1832. Its efforts paid off. The first reformed Parliament was clearly sympathetic to abolition; perhaps just as important the Cabinet was ready to accept emancipation. In May 1833 Lord Stanley presented a plan to Parliament which finally passed into law on August 29. In essence, the new legislation called for the gradual abolition of slavery. Everyone over the age of six on August 1, 1834, when the law went into effect, was required to serve an apprenticeship of four years in the case of domestics and six years in the case of field hands (apprenticeship was later abolished by Parliament in 1838). By way of compensation the West Indian planters received £20 million.
Top
Foreign anti-slavery
British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society © In the space of some 46 years, between 1787 and 1833, Britain had not only outlawed the slave trade but also abolished slavery throughout her colonial possessions. For many the struggle was over. For others, however, 1833 signalled a new beginning. Despite Britain’s withdrawal from the Atlantic slave trade, the traffic still flourished; in fact, since 1807 it had steadily grown (or so it seemed to contemporaries). Slavery also still flourished, most notably in the United States. Here was a fresh challenge. In 1839, with the organisation of the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society, British anti-slavery entered a new (international) phase.
As its name implied, the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society was committed to the extirpation of the slave trade and slave systems globally. Among its targets were legalised slavery in British India and Ceylon, suppression of the Brazilian and Cuban slave trades, and, increasingly after 1850, the abolition of slavery in the United States. None of these issues had quite the immediacy of West Indian emancipation, however, and there is little question that support for British anti-slavery declined significantly during the 1850s and 1860s. Nevertheless, the abolition of slavery in the United States in 1865 (and the adoption of the Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution in March 1870 which extended the right of voting to all races) was properly regarded as a victory for abolitionists on both sides of the Atlantic.
This remarkable story raises a simple but crucial question: why did the British turn against slavery and the slave trade? Part of the reason is undoubtedly the rise of compassionate humanitarianism, particularly amongst an increasingly leisured middle class. Scholars also point to the influence of Nonconformist religion, on the one hand, and Evangelical Protestantism, on the other. But of greater significance was a shift in economic thought. In the British case slavery flourished because West Indian planters were effectively subsidised by the British taxpayer. By the late 1820s, when many Britons began to see the benefits of a world economy untrammelled by restrictions and controls, such privileges seemed outmoded and frankly unwarranted. Indeed, it is probably true to say that the British slave system was ‘not so much rendered unprofitable, but by-passed by the changing economic and social order in Britain’.
Top
Find out more
Books
The Overthrow of Colonial Slavery, 1776-1848 by Robin Blackburn (1988)
Popular Politics and British Anti-Slavery: The Mobilisation of Public Opinion against the Slave Trade, 1787-1807 by John Oldfield (1995)
England, Slaves and Freedom by James Walvin (1987)
Making the Black Atlantic: Britain and the African Diaspora by James Walvin (2000)
Places to visit
There is a permanent exhibition on the transatlantic slave trade at Merseyside Maritime Museum in Liverpool.
The birthplace of William Wilberforce in Kingston upon Hull is now a museum dedicated to his life and fight against slavery. The website features a virtual tour and a 3D virtual reality tour of the house.
Top
About the author
Dr John Oldfield lectures at the University of Southampton. His publications include Popular Politics and British Anti-Slavery (Manchester, 1995) and Civilization and Black Progress: Selected Writings of Alexander Crummell on the South (1995).
Top
«;More Empire and Seapower
British History Timeline

• Explore the British History Timeline from the Neolithic to the present day
World War One Centenary

• Find out more about how the BBC is covering the World War One Centenary, and see the latest programmes and online content
Surviving the trenches

• Dan Snow asks why so many soldiers survived the trenches in WW1
The History of the Home

• Take a journey through the history of the home. Each room tells a different story.
BBC iD
Sign in
• Settings Sign out Search term:
BBC navigation
• News
• Sport
• Weather
• iPlayer
• TV
• Radio
• More…
• CBBCCBeebiesComedyFoodHistoryLearning
• Music
• Science
• Nature
• Local
• Northern IrelandScotlandWalesFull A-Z of BBC sitesBBC links

o Mobile site
o Terms of Use
o About the BBC

o Privacy
o Accessibility Help

o Cookies
o Contact the BBC

o Parental Guidance

BBC © 2014 The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read more.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂

Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away

Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00
Live Chat+1-631-333-0101EmailWhatsApp