Posted: February 20th, 2015

Online Presentation of Artifact

Online Presentation of Artifact

Order Description

For this Discussion Forum, you will present an online presentation of an Artifact. Click here for full instructions on how to do the Artifact Presentation.

Artifact Online Presentation

On week 1, you will be producing and presenting a brief online presentation of an important, personal artifact. An artifact is a material object, such as a book, a picture, etc., that is representative of an important value or significant experience in your life. If something does not immediately spring to mind, it may help to look around your home and or office. What catches your eye? Why have you chosen to keep the object and display it? Answering those questions may help you to identify the artifact. Remember, it is the value or experience, and not the artifact, which is important. While that value or experience does not need to be “earth shaking,” it does need to reflect something significant in your life.

For the online presentation, you can video yourself with the artifact or you can take a picture of the artifact and use the image of the artifact in a Screencast-O-Matic or any other kind of online presentation medium. Regardless of what method you choose, we must be able to see the artifact.

To receive full points you must:

1.Choose a significant and meaningful object.

2.Show the object clearly in the presentation.

3. Be sure to give the viewer your name.

4.Provide a description that explains the object and why it has value or experience.

5.Describe how you believe your artifact relates to your worldview.

6.Your presentation should be no more than 3-4 minutes. 5-page draft needed before order submission.
Compensated additionally as 3 pages cost bonus 5-page draft needed before order submission.
Compensated additionally as 3 pages cost bonus 5-page draft needed before order submission.
Compensated additionally as 3 pages cost bonus 5-page draft needed before order submission.
Compensated additionally as 3 pages cost bonus 5-page draft needed before order submission.
Compensated additionally as 3 pages cost bonus

Consider the following two scenarios:
Scenario 1:
Employees work in an atmosphere of distrust and fear. Leaders make decisions behind closed doors. Changes to processes and staffing often occur unexpectedly without warning or explanation. A few select people are given information and guard it jealously. Most employees do not get an opportunity to give input or feedback.
Scenario 2:
Employees work in a small company where everyone knows everything about everyone and the rumor mill runs rampant. Leadership gives both praise and reprimands in public. They frequently discuss employees’ personal affairs.
These scenarios illustrate two extremes of transparency in business. Maintaining the right degree of transparency is a challenge for many organizations. Some leaders operate their organizations with an open-book management style. Others believe in carefully maintaining the security of information. Leaders must determine the appropriate level of transparency necessary for their organizations to stay healthy.
To prepare:
Write a 3 page paper on the theory of transparency of information and decision making in organizations.
Course Text(s)
•    Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
•    American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.).Washington, DC: Author.
REFERENCED BELOW…
PLEASE FOLLOW THE PAPER’S RUBIC FOR GRADING!!!!!
Initial Posting

15 points maximum    Exemplary
(14–15 points)    Acceptable
(11–13 points)    Minimal Acceptance
(0–10 points)
Initial post is original, thought-provoking, in-depth, and demonstrates quality research and in depth reflection.

Posting stimulates critical inquiry and further discussion.

Arguments are logically presented and well supported. When appropriate, insight gained from personal experience is used in combination with scholarly resources as support.

Initial post is made in a timely manner (allowing adequate time for colleagues to respond).
Initial post is acceptable but does not consistently demonstrate higher-order thinking.

More support from scholarly resources or personal experience is needed. The logic of the arguments presented could be improved.

Initial post is made late in the timeline of the week (allowing limited time for colleagues to respond).    Initial post is vague, incomplete, or demonstrates a low level of thinking.

Initial post is made so late that colleagues have inadequate time to respond.
Follow-Up Response(s) Postings

10 points maximum    Exemplary
(9–10 points)    Acceptable
(7-8 points)    Minimal Acceptance
(0–6 points)
Response demonstrates a critical and thoughtful understanding of the topic and brings the Discussion to a higher level of inquiry and investigation.

Response demonstrates meaningful defense of viewpoint.

Responses to two or more colleagues are made in a timely manner (allowing ample time for colleagues to read and benefit from the postings).
Response demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic and brings the Discussion to a higher level of inquiry.

Some demonstration of defense of argument is present.

Responses to two or more colleagues are made late in the timeline of the week.    Response demonstrates a lack of understanding of the topic.

No higher-order thinking is demonstrated.

Responses are made to only one colleague very late in the timeline of the week, or no response is posted at all.
Adherence to Grammar and Style Guidelines

15 points maximum    Exemplary
(14–15 points)    Acceptable
(11-13 points)    Minimal Acceptance
(0–10 points)
Clear, unambiguous writing that includes proper sentence structure, idea development, paragraph development, and grammar.    Relatively clear writing that includes proper sentence structure, reasonable idea and paragraph development, and few grammatical errors.    Unclear, poorly developed writing that lacks proper sentence structure and idea and paragraph development, with numerous grammatical errors.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂