Posted: April 3rd, 2015

Postgraduate level- Corporate Governance

Postgraduate level- Corporate Governance

show evidenced of deep research and understanding and cove all Learning Outcomes and Module aims

Note: the reading material is about the whole course. Risk management slide is not out yet, hope that is alright. Fell free to contact me if anything through messages.
Reading material and Lecture topics as well as Seminar topics are (attached) below
But only as starting point. So, Please use reliable sources and kindly expand more
in both academic and practical sources (including Journals) to support your critique – give evidence and use multiple sources
Question:
“Is Risk Management a tool in good corporate governance or a good corporate governance is essential through proper controls over risk management?” Discuss
you could use both current and past examples to describe your analysis.

Assessment criteria:
• Depth of research 30%
• Quality of critique 25%
• Use of relevant examples 20%
• Use of appropriate theory 15%
• Presentation of material 10%

Essay -Postgraduate level- Corporate Governance module

Assignment briefs max 4000 word

Please, read all (below) attached material carefully.
Kindly, show evidenced of deep research and understanding and cove all Learning Outcomes and Module aims

Note: the reading material is about the whole course. Risk management slide is not out yet, hope that is alright. Fell free to contact me if anything through messages.
Reading material and Lecture topics as well as Seminar topics are (attached) below
But only as starting point. So, Please use reliable sources and kindly expand more
in both academic and practical sources (including Journals) to support your critique – give evidence and use multiple sources

Question:
“Is Risk Management a tool in good corporate governance or a good corporate governance is essential through proper controls over risk management?” Discuss
you could use both current and past examples to describe your analysis.

Assessment criteria:

•    Depth of research                                             30%
•    Quality of critique                                               25%
•    Use of relevant examples                                     20%
•    Use of appropriate theory                                    15%
•    Presentation of material                                        10%