Posted: May 19th, 2017

In the preceding question, a recognized argument against holding Gregslist criminally liable for complicity in its customers’ prostitution activities would be

In the preceding question, a recognized argument against holding Gregslist criminally liable for complicity in its customers’ prostitution activities would be: a. It simply can’t be a crime for legitimate businesses merely to sell ordinary goods and services to buyers who happen to use them in illegal activities. b. Prostitution is probably not ranked as a “serious” crime for this purpose. c. Even if Gregslist has knowledge of its customers’ illegal activities, any “assistance” it provides is solely for the purpose of making money itself. d. The Constitution does not permit government to force private citizens and businesses into becoming an unpaid branch of law enforcement by punishing them if they don’t spy and report on other people’s suspicious conduct.