Posted: September 13th, 2017

Problem Description

Problem Description

Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section C: Literature Support To begin, work through the reference list that was created in the “Section B: Problem Description” assignment in Module 2. Appraise each resource using the “Rapid Critical Ap

To begin, work through the reference list that was created in the "Section B: Problem Description" assignment in Module 2. Appraise each resource using the "Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists," available in the textbook appendix or electronically on the textbook student resource CD-ROM. The specific checklist you use will be determined by the type of evidence within the resource.
Develop a research table to organize and summarize the research studies. Using a summary table allows you to be more concise in your narrative description. Only research studies used to support your intervention are summarized in this table. Refer to the "Evaluation Table Template," available in the textbook appendix. Use the "Evaluation Table Template" as an adaptable template.
Write a narrative of 750-1,000 words (not including the title page and references) that presents the research support for the projects problem and proposed solution. Make sure to do the following:
1) Include a description of the search method (e.g., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).
2) Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.
3) Incorporate a description of the validity of the internal and external research.

It is essential to make sure that the research support for the proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant, and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles.

Although you will not be submitting the checklist information or the evaluation table you design in Module 3 with the narrative, the checklist information and evaluation table should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Refer to "NUR 699 Literature Support Holistic Assessment."

Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine Section C: Literature Support for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.
NUR699.v10R.LiteratureSupportHolisticAssessment_Stud
NUR 699 – Capstone
Literature Support Holistic Assessment
Directions: Utilizing the assessment tool below, the first submission of this portion of the assignment will be graded holistically. In order to achieve the full points for the assignment, all the criteria on the left must be met at the competency level described on the right.

Criteria
12 pts 24 pts 36 pts 48 pts 60 pts
Literature Support
Summarize the research support for the projects problem and proposed solution. Describe the search method.
Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. Describe research strengths and limitations as well as the validity of the internal and external research. Provides sufficient, compelling, relevant research from peer-reviewed professional journals. Lists the individual research support for the projects problem and proposed solution without an in-depth explanation. Lists the search method data without details. Analysis of the research strengths and limitations is not outlined or outlined poorly. The research support may not be relevant and/or may not be from peer-reviewed professional journals. Reveals inaccurate comprehension of material and lacks the ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Lists the individual research support for the projects problem and proposed solution without an in-depth explanation. Lists the search method data identifying some but not all of the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Ignores or superficially evaluates the research strengths and limitations, draws unwarranted conclusions. The research support may not be relevant and/or may not be from peer-reviewed professional journals. Displays a lack of comprehension but attempts to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

 
Provides a basic overview of the individual research support for the projects problem and proposed solution. Minimally includes any rationale, details and/or examples of the validity of the internal and external research. Lists the search method data identifying some but not all of the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Conducts a surface level of evaluation of the research strengths and limitations. Very narrow conclusions are provided. The research support is relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journals. Exhibits comprehension of the material and clearly attempts to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Provides a complete summary of the individual research support for the projects problem and proposed solution in a concise manner. Describes the validity of the internal and external research providing some detailed rationale. Describes the search method identifying the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Analyzes the research strengths and limitations and provided direct, competent, and appropriate conclusions. The research support is relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journals. Demonstrates integrative and accurate comprehension and applies information as appropriate. Comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Provides a detailed summary of the individual research support for the projects problem and proposed solution emphasizing the essential components. Describes the validity of the internal and external research in-depth. Describes the search method identifying the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates the research strengths and limitations, drawing warranted conclusions.
The research support is sufficient, compelling, relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journals. Demonstrates clarity and specificity of comprehension and synthesizes all relevant information. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Comments:
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂