Posted: June 8th, 2015
Assessment Item No. 2
Assessment name: Problem Solving Task
Description: Written Assignment (Review & Development Project)
Use the Index of Inclusion materials (Booth & Ainscow, 2002) to plan a class/school review of culture, policy and practice. Engage a group of stakeholders such as students, parents and teachers in the process. Collect data using a selection of the recommended surveys in the Index for Inclusion and suggest a plan of action to address the issues raised in the process.
Length: 3,000 words
Relates to learning outcomes: 1, 2 & 3
Weight: 60%
Internal or external: External
Group or Individual: Individual
Due date: End-Semester (due 1st June)
Key Headings for Assessment 2
Assessment Item 2 Planning Sheet Due for discussion in Week 6 (30th March)
The Zeigarnik Effect
Use the Zeigarnik effect to your advantage. When you have a big task to do, don’t start it cold. Open the” file” and start reading and planning early!
Assessment Description: Use the Index of Inclusion materials (Booth & Ainscow, 2002) to plan a class/school review of culture or policy or practice. Engage a group of stakeholders such as students, parents and teachers in the process. Collect data using the Index for Inclusion (you can modify and adapt the surveys to meet your needs, you can use focus group interviews or you can develop your own activities to collect data) and suggest a plan of action to address the issues raised in the process. Refer to the literature in SPN644 to justify how your plan will inform more inclusive culture, policy, practice.
Planning for Assignment 2
ü I have reviewed the Index for Inclusion
|
My notes:
|
ü I have chosen my setting for my project (School and or classroom)
|
My notes:
|
ü I have sent the principal a copy of the permission letter
|
ü Brief notes about my chosen area of culture, policy and practice or a combination of these dimensions
|
My notes:
|
Criteria | Unsatisfactory 3 |
Satisfactory 4 |
Good 5 |
Excellent 6 |
Outstanding 7 |
Use of Index for Inclusion for review and development | Lack of familiarity with the Index for Inclusion | Basic awareness and comprehension | Applies ideas and principles to the task | Critical analysis of elements of the Index and use of materials in a particular context | Critical analyses and evaluation of elements, relationships and principles that translate into new and extended ways of using the Index for Inclusion.
|
Followed expected guidelines for Assessment 2 | Headings and structure do not meet the guidelines | Basic guidelines followed | Good clear structure that addresses the guidelines | Structure and quality is excellent and matches the expected guidelines | Structure and quality is outstanding with detailed information provided in the Appendix to support the report of the project |
Cognition
Links to Unit textbook and CMD readings |
Inadequate knowledge about inclusive education | Understands appropriate ideas, facts and concepts | Transforms, explains, distinguishes theories | Interprets theory and relates to practice | extends, generalises understanding of inclusive education from policy to practice |
Structure of presentation
Uses APA reference style |
Incoherent, hard to follow, confusing
Poor referencing |
Identifiable structure but weak transitions
Satisfactory APA
|
Well developed paragraphs and transitions
APA clearly followed |
Coherent and sophisticated scholarly document
APA clearly followed |
Exceptional and outstanding quality of scholarly document with clear evidence in Appendix documents
Journal submission quality APA clearly followed |
Task relevance | Failure to address all requirements | Task components mostly identified | Task interpreted and addressed very well | Creative response | Creative and sophisticated response to assessment task. 2.
Excellent evidence of links between theory and practice Possible publication opportunity. |
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.