Posted: April 27th, 2015
Public Health: Philosophy, Principles and Practice
An essay about:
Australian Public Health IssueandResponse
Instructions
General areas needed:
– Public health: Australian Public Health IssueandResponse(Please show your understanding).
– Word count: 2000 – 2200 words maximum (excludingin&end text reference).
-Text book: use as recommended (Fran Baum) The New Public Health 3rd edition.
Baum, F. (2008). The new public health (3rd ed.). South Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
– Marks: 100. It is really high since this is a major assignment, so please make your work clear enough without any repetitions and try to be very specific (concise)as well asprecise to the point.
– Please use Australian spelling.
– (correct) APAstyle12 point font, double spacing, first line indent for paragraphs
– (correct) APAstyle for {in text and end text referencing} Please make sure to include the page numbers for all sources (in & end text references).
One (1)referenceper100 words) you need about 22 – 27 sources minimum.
Format:
Please follow the APA assessment format. This includes double spacing, indenting paragraphs,Times New Roman font 12also first line indent for paragraphsand correct formatting and ordering of referencelist (alphabetical order of first author and hanging indents).
Structure:
-The assessment should include an overall introduction andseries of well-constructed paragraphs in the body of your essayand conclusion. Headings and Sub-headingsare NOTACCEPTED sine you need to link each question with the rest to ensure the logic flow.
-Please note, NO NEED FOR ANY tables or graphs.
-Questions must be answered in order. Complete the assessment using topic paragraphs,
ensuring good logical flow throughout.
-Supporting your work with references
You are expected to support your work throughout with appropriately cited academic material
(referenced evidence). Sources of this evidence include recent text books on public health(5years or less especially for data or statistics / facts which it is not ok to have out of date ones)or a related subject, peer reviewed journals and reliable public health websites.
A minimum of (20) sources is required and please consider to be in Australia.
-Do not rewrite or paraphrase large sections of any article or long descriptive lists.
-Find further reliable and academic material to reference in your work in order to support your answers.
-Answer all the (4) questions (address all parts of individual questions) in sections while you are writing.
– You need to link all the (4) questions (sections/points) together.
Overview:
This assignment requires you to complete an essay on the issue of public health responses to sexually transmitted infections in the Australian population. Your work must be written in essay format, and must address the four (4) points outlined below within the structure of the essay. Use the marking rubric to guide your work as below in the last 2 pages of this file. Also refer to the Master’s Level Marking Guide (see below) for expected levels of work and corresponding grades.
In this assignment you will demonstrate achievement of the following Learning Outcomes:
1-Demonstrate an understanding of the wide range of factors that need to be considered in thinking about the possible “causes” of specific health outcomes.
2-Describe in detail the nature of public health information, including public health surveillance and other epidemiological methods.
3-Demonstrate the nature and importance to human health of communicable diseases.
3-Discuss in detailselected recent developments in public health nationally.
Task (questions as the (4) points below):
Topic: Australian Population health: Sexual health
Critically analysepublic health responses to the issue of sexually transmitted infections(STIs) in the Australian population. Your essay must include a discussion on recenttrends and patterns in the incidence and prevalence of STIs, and a detailed analysis of public health responses to STIs.
Please take particular notice of the instructions in italics as below;
Your essay must address the following (4) points:
Point (1).Explain relevant population health data which identifies recenttrends and patterns in four (4) commonly occurring sexually transmitted infections in the Australian population. Demonstrate an ability to analyse, interpret and explainrelevant, recent and reliable health data.
Key concepts:
(Maximum15 marks)
Point (2).Discussvariations in the incidence and prevalence of two (2) of these sexually transmitted infectionsacrossdifferent Australian population groups, and the contributory factors influencing these variations. Refer to public health theory on the determinants of health within your answer. (Maximum15 marks)
Key concepts:
Point (3).Chooseone (1) of the two sexually transmitted infections discussed
in Point 2. Discuss how the Government’s National Strategy proposes to reduce this disease in the Australian population. Discuss the proposed actions with reference to contemporary public health principles. (Maximum25 marks)
Key concepts:
For better understanding I got this for you
Five national strategies
The Council of Australian Governments (COAG) Health Council endorsed five new national strategies for blood borne viruses (BBV) and sexually transmissible infections (STI) in June 2014.
The five strategies are:
Source: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/ohp-national-strategies-2010
Point (4).Chooseone (1)recent sexually transmitted infection health promotion initiative which targets a particular population group (such as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender, Aboriginal people, teenagers, rural and remote communities, sex workers etc.).Outline and critique the main objectives and proposed actions of this initiative. Support your critique with reference to the Ottawa Charter. Discuss the potential strengthsand limitations of this initiative for this specific population groupin terms of itsalignment with the main features of the Ottawa Charter. (Maximum35 marks)
Key concepts:
For better understanding I got this for you
Ottawa Charter
1- Advocate (what)
2- Enable (who)
3- Mediate (who / what)
The Ottawa Charter identifies health promotion priority action areas as:
Source: http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/previous/ottawa/en/index1.html
Academic writing and referencing (10 marks)
10 marks will be awarded for academic writing style and correct referencing in this assessment. This includes essay format, grammar, structure and referencing (see marking rubric for details).
It is expected that you will refer to sufficient academic sources within in your essay (approximate guide: one (1)referenceper100 words)
VERY IMPORTANT:
Unit content relevant to this assessment (Unit material which includes):
Determinants of health.
Public health information.
Aspects of public health in Australia.
New challenges for public health/ contemporary public health.
Organisation of public health services.
Marking Rubric
Relevance of answer to assignment task (is the point addressed fully?) |
Discussion is consistently supported by cited evidence from relevant, recent and reliable sources |
Demonstration of the ability to relate and apply the discussion to health and public health concepts, theories or approaches |
Evidence of ability to interpret and explain population health data/ information |
|
Point 1 | ||||
Point 2 | ||||
Point 3 | ||||
Point 4 | ||||
Logical layout: essay format used, including introduction, conclusion and subject paragraphs. | ||||
Presentation: including grammar, spelling and style.
In text and end text referencing.
|
||||
Master’s Level Marking Guide
Marking rubric Criterion/ level achieved | Fail (N) | Pass (P) | Credit (CR) | Distinction (D) | High Distinction (HD) | |
Relevance of answer to assignment task (are the questions answered fully?) |
The questions are inadequately answered. An insufficient amount of relevant information is included. |
The questions are sufficiently answered with a satisfactory inclusion of relevant information. |
The majority of information included is relevant, but the questions are not fully answered. |
The questions are fully answered. The majority of the information is relevant to the topic. |
The questions are fully answered with all the information relevant to the topic. |
|
All answers are supported by cited evidence from relevant, recent and reliable sources |
Work is insufficiently supported by relevant cited sources |
Satisfactory inclusion of cited material, however some of which is dated or of questionable reliability/relevance/ some inappropriate use of referenced work. |
Satisfactory inclusion of relevant cited material within the work |
Wide sourcing of relevant cited material within the majority of the work |
Underpins all work with relevant cited material throughout |
|
|
Insufficient relation/application shown |
Limited relation/application, with some areas of confusion and errors |
Demonstrates satisfactory relation/ application |
Demonstrates a good level of relation/application |
Demonstrates an excellent and consistent relation/application |
|
Evidence of ability to interpret and explain population health data/ information
|
Work is limited to description |
Work is mainly descriptive with little critical analysis attempted |
Satisfactory evidence critical analysis |
Good level of critical analysis |
Excellent and consistent level of interpretation or explanation throughout
|
|
Logical flow:
essay format used, including introduction and conclusion and subject paragraphs. |
High amount of disjointed work (problems with logical flow) | Moderate levels of disjointed work (problems with logical flow) | Work shows satisfactory structure and logical flow overall | Good structure and logical flow to the majority of the work | Excellent structure and logical flow throughout | |
Presentation: including formatting, grammar, spelling and style |
High number of errors which severely impact on the readability/comprehensibility of the work in places |
Moderate to high number of errors which impact on the readability/comprehensibility of the work in places |
Moderate number of errors |
Minimal number of errors in presentation |
No minor errors in presentation |
|
In text and end text referencing |
APA referencing style poorly demonstrated throughout |
High number of errors |
Moderate number of errors |
Minimal errors |
No errors |
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.