Posted: December 10th, 2014

Supervisory Theory and Practice

Supervisory Theory and Practice

Assignment #4: Differentiated Supervisory/Evaluation Plan
(Presentation and written paper constructed students, 35 points,

Select one of the following and review available resources and literature to learn the current position of those researching and writing in the field. To deepen your insight and understanding of your groups chosen topic, include in your paper references and comments from in-depth interviews with experienced administrators whom you believe to be knowledgeable in this area. Your group will present your findings in a 6-8-page paper due in module eight.

1.    Supervision and evaluation of educational administrators:  What systems are seen in the field and how effective are they? What is done well? What is left unattended? Make sure to include in your search the use of mentoring and performance-based appraisal systems. Does the School Board have any responsibilities in this area? Focus your search on administrative positions that do not have classroom responsibilities:  principals and their assistants; directors of operations and of finance; superintendents and their assistants. Then based on your research and interview, construct a supervisory/evaluation plan that your group thinks best meets the needs of the administrators in your school or district.
2.    Teacher supervision in a true “learning community”:  What would it look like? What are some of the “cutting edge” teacher supervision/evaluation systems out there? What benefits are being gained in schools where they are in use? Then based on your research and interviews, construct a supervisory/evaluation plan that your group thinks best meets the needs of the teachers in your school or district.

Rubric Assignment #4
–
Differentiated Supervision/Evaluation Plan
Select one of the topics in the syllabus and review available resources and the literature to learn the current position of
those researching and writing in the area chosen. Submit a 6
–
8
–
p
age summary of your results.
This can be done as a group. Due
Week 8
Name:
Date:
Criteria for Evaluation: total points available= 35 points
Needs Improvement
Meets
Exceeds
Comments and Points
Narrative
overview of the
supervision plan
6
Narrative is weak or
does not clearly address
the supervisory process
in the plan.
8
Narrative adequately
addresses the processes
but needs further
explanation of the expected
outcomes of the plan.
10
Narrative clearly and
effectively addresses the
proc
esses and the expected
outcomes of the plan.
Interview
/
application to
the supervision
plan
6
Summary is weak in
explaining the interview
application to plan.
8
Summary adequately
explains the interview
application to plan.
10
Summary clearly and
effect
ively explains the
interview application to plan.
Presentation
of
how the plan
links to the
current
literature
6
Explanation is weak or
does not deepen insight
and understanding of
how the plan links to the
literature.
8
Explanation adequately
provide
s understanding of
how the plan links to the
literature.
10
Explanation provides deep
insight and clear, well
–
developed understanding of
how the plan links to the
literature.
Paper:
Grammar,
Spelling. APA
style.
3
Paper has numerous
grammatical and/or
spelling errors and does
not follow APA format.
4
Paper has 2
–
4 grammatical
and/or spelling errors and
lacks some APA format.
5
Paper is free of grammatical
and spelling errors and
clearly follows APA style
and format.
Total points awarded=__

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂