Posted: December 7th, 2014

Tarasoff—Exploring, Understanding, and Implications

statutes related to confidentiality and “duty to warn.” They also should understand how these statutes apply to their own practice. As you review the Tarasoff case and related readings, be mindful of the issue of vicarious liability, which extends “duty to warn” liability to a counselor’s supervisor.
For this Assignment, explore ethical challenges related to issues of confidentiality. Review the Tarasoff media and consider the implications of the Tarasoff decision.
The Assignment (2–3 pages):
Use the Formatted Template for APA guidelines in the Learning Resources.
Summarize your state case law and statutes related to the Tarasoff decision. If you are an international student, summarize your region’s case law and statutes as they relate to “duty to warn” and/or “duty to protect.”
Explain how you might resolve “duty to warn” and/or “duty to protect’ dilemmas in your state or region, noting relevant ethical codes and ethical decision-making models. Be specific, referencing specific case law and statutes.
Explain how the media presented in this week contributed to your understanding of confidentiality and the challenges to confidentiality.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂