Posted: November 26th, 2014
THE MUENNING OIL COMPANY;
“Look, you asked for my advice, and I gave it to you,” Frank Kelsey said. “If I were
you, I wouldn’t make
any more concessions! I really don’t think you ought to agree to their
last demand! But you’re the one who has to live with the contract, not me!”
Static on the transatlantic telephone connection obscured Jean Fontaine’s reply.
Kelsey asked him to repeat w
hat he had said.
“OK, OK, calm down, Jean. I can see your point of view. I appreciate the pressures
you’re under. But I sure don’t like the looks of it from this end. Keep in touch
—
I’ll talk to
you early next week. In the meantime, I will see what others a
t the office think about this turn
of events.”
Frank Kelsey hung up the phone. He sat pensively, staring out at the rain pounding on
the window. “Poor Fontaine,” he muttered to himself. “He’s so anxious to please the
customer, he’d feel compelled to give t
hem the whole pie without getting his fair share of the
dessert!”
Kelsey cleaned and lit his pipe as he mentally reviewed the history of the
negotiations. “My word,” he thought to himself, “we are getting eaten in little bites in this
Reliant deal! And I c
an’t make Fontaine see it!”
BACKGROUND
Muenning
Oil Company was founded in 1902
.
The founder of
Muenning
Oil,
J
.
E
.
Muenning
, pioneered a major oil strike in north central Oklahoma that touched
off the
Oklahoma “black gold” rush of the early 1900s. Through growth and acquisition in the 1920s
and 30s,
Muenning
expanded the company rapidly
. After a period of consolidation in the
1940s and 50s,
Muenning
expanded
again. It developed extensive oil holdings in North
Africa and the Middle East, as well as significant coal beds in the western United States.
Much of
Muenning
’s oil production is sold
under other company names
as gasoline through
service stations in the United St
ates and Europe, but it is also distributed through several
chains of “independent” gasoline stations. In addition,
Muenning
is also one of the largest
and best known worldwide producers of industrial petrochemicals.
One of
Muenning
’s major industrial chemic
al lines is the production of vinyl chloride
monomer (VCM). The basic components of VCM are ethylene and chlorine. Ethylene is a
colorless, flammable, gaseous hydrocarbon with a disagreeable odor; it is generally obtained
from natural or coal gas, or by “c
racking” petroleum into smaller molecular components. As
a further step in the petroleum “cracking” process, ethylene is combined with chlorine to
produce VCM, also a colorless gas.
VCM is the primary component of a family of plastics known as the vinyl
ch
lorides. VCM is subjected to the process of polymerization, in which smaller
molecules of vinyl chloride are chemically bonded together to form larger molecular
chains and networks. As the bonding occurs, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is produced;
coloring pigm
ents may be added, as well as “plasticizer” compounds that determine the
relative flexibility or hardness of the finished material. Through various forms of
calendering (pressing between heavy rollers), extruding and injection molding, the
plasticized poly
vinyl chloride is converted to an enormous array of consumer and
industrial applications: flooring, wire insulation, electrical transformers, home
furnishings, piping, toys, bottles and containers, rainwear, light roofing, and a variety of
protective coati
ngs. (See Exhibit 1 for a breakdown of common PVC
–
based products.)
3
In 2006,
Muenning
Oil established the first major contract with the Reliant Corporation for
the purchase of vinyl chloride monomer. The Reliant Corporation was a major industrial
manufacture
r of wood and petrochemical products for the construction industry. Reliant was
expanding its manufacturing operations in the production of plastic pipe and pipe fittings,
particularly in Europe. The use of plastic as a substitute for iron or copper pipe w
as gaining
rapid acceptance in the construction trades, and the European markets were significantly
more progressive in adopting the plastic pipe. Reliant already had developed a small
polyvinyl chloride production facility at Abbeville, France, and
Muenning
constructed a
pipeline from its petrochemical plant at Antwerp to Abbeville.
The 2006 contract between
Muenning
Oil and Reliant was a fairly standard one for
the industry, and due to expire in December of 2009. The contract was negotiated by
Reliant’s pur
chasing managers in Europe, headquartered in Brussels, and the senior
marketing managers of
Muenning
Oil’s European offices, located in Paris. Each of these
individuals reported to the vice presidents in charge of their company’s European offices,
who in tu
rn reported back to their respective corporate headquarters in the States. (See
Exhibits 2 and 3 for partial organization charts.)
THE 2002 CONTRACT RENEWAL
In February 2009, negotiations began to extend the four
–
year contract beyond the
December 31, 20
09, expiration date. Jean Fontaine,
Muenning
Oil’s marketing vice president
for Europe, discussed the Reliant account with his VCM marketing manager, Paul Gaudin.
Fontaine had been promoted to the European vice presidency approximately 16 months
earlier aft
er having served as
Muenning
’s ethylene marketing manager. Fontaine had been
with
Muenning
Oil for 11 years, and had a reputation as a strong “up and comer” in
Muenning
’s European operations. Gaudin had been appointed as VCM marketing manager
eight months ear
lier; this was his first job with
Muenning
Oil, although he had five years of
previous experience in European computer sales with a large American computer
manufacturing company. Fontaine and Gaudin had worked well in their short time together,
establishing
a strong professional and personal relationship. Fontaine and Gaudin agreed that
the Reliant account had been an extremely profitable and beneficial one for
Muenning
, and
believed that Reliant had, overall, been satisfied with the quality and service under
the
agreement as well. They clearly wanted to work hard to obtain a favorable renegotiation of
the existing agreement. Fontaine and Gaudin also reviewed the latest projections of
worldwide VCM supply which they had just received from corporate headquarter
s. (See
Exhibit 4.) The data confirmed what they already knew
—
that there was a worldwide shortage
of VCM and that demand was continuing to rise.
Muenning
envisioned that the current
demand
–
supply situation would remain this way for a number of years. As a r
esult,
Muenning
believed that it could justify a high favorable formula price for VCM.
Fontaine and Gaudin decided that they would approach Reliant with an offer to
renegotiate the current agreement. Their basic strategy would be to ask Reliant for their fi
ve
–
year demand projections on VCM and polyvinyl chloride products. Once these projections
were received, Fontaine and Gaudin would frame the basic formula price that they would
offer. (It would be expected that there would be no significant changes or vari
ations in other
elements of the contract, such as delivery and contract language.) In their negotiations, their
strategy would be as follows:
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.