Posted: August 27th, 2015

The notion of intergenerational abuse

The notion of intergenerational abuse

Order Description

A2 Assessment ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY (1,000 words) Worth: 40%

A2 Description
Students are to complete annotated bibliographies for five pieces of academic literature related to the course content.
One of the annotations must be from the set course readings which is Tilbury, C, Osmond, J Wilson S, Clark, J 2007, ‘Theories about child abuse and neglect’ in good practice in child protection PP. 19-44.
The other four annotations must be from recent academic literature from this list below
1 Dixon L, Browne K, Hamilton-Giachritsis C, 2005, Risk factor of parents abused as children: a meditational analysis of the intergenerational continuity of child maltreatment, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 46:1 p. 47-57.
2 Ertem, I, O, Levental, J, M, Dobbs, S, 2000, Intergenerational continuity of child physical abuse: how good is the evidence? The Lancet, vol. 356 p.814 -819.
3 McDonald, R, Ernest, N, Jouriles, Candyce, D, Tart, Minze, Laura, C 2008, ‘Children’s adjustment problems in families characterized by men’s severe violence toward women: Does other family violence matter?’, Journal of Family Psychology Review, vol. 33, p. 94-101.
4Sheridan M, J, 1995, A Proposed Intergenerational model of Substance abuse, family functioning, and abuse/neglect, Child Abuse and Neglect vol. 19 no. 5 p. 519-530.
BELOW IS THE TOPIC
(The notion of intergenerational abuse)
Each annotation will be approximately 200 words
A sample annotation is provided here – Making an Annotated Reading list.
An annotated reading list is a list of Annotated Readings.

Each Annotated Reading contains:
• A citation (like a normal reference list)
• A paragraph, maximum 150 words, providing
o Authority of the author (1 sentence)
o brief summary of what the article/book is about (1-2 sentences)
o comment on intended audience (1 sentence)
o critical assessment : how relevant is it, contribution it makes to the topic, compare and contrast the item with others in your annotated bibliography (1-2 sentences)
o example below
o Example given be

Annotated paragraph is 105 in total

Assessment Criteria
Marking Criteria and Standards:
Criteria HD D C P F
Relevance of References
Outstanding
Coverage of
Topic
Very good
Coverage of
Topic
Good
Coverage of
Topic
Adequate
Coverage of
Topic
Limited
Coverage of
Topic
Annotations
Excellent
Well inked
Clear,
Concise
Analysis
Very well linked
Clear,
Concise
Analysis
Generally
Well linked
Clear,
Concise
Analysis
Adequate Limited
Clarity of writing Flawless Very good good Adequate Limited
Appropriate,
Accurate Referencing Flawless Very good Adequate Limited
School