Posted: June 1st, 2015
Topic: complication after sheath removal
NURS3001: Dynamics of Practice 2
Assessment Rubric for Assignment 2 – Critical analysis of a case scenario
Student Name:_________________________________ Date: Marked by:_____________________________________
| Introduction
Purpose of this paper. Introduce the patient, and the scenario. Introduce what nursing priority will be discussed in this paper. 10% |
Excellent outline of aim and purpose of the paper. Logical signposting of the content that will be discussed in the paper.
|
|
| Understanding the issue
Provide an in-depth rationale of the chosen issue. Discuss the importance of issue in clinical practice and to patient outcome. 20% |
Pathophysiology of the condition is discussed in depth. Objective and subjective data identified correctly. Majority of issues identified are relevant to the scenario and for an inpatient setting. Demonstrated an excellent critical analysis of the scenario. Correct information presented. Discussion is closely relevant to the case scenario. | |
| Clinical practice
Discuss and critically analyse best practice, patient centered care, pathopharmacology, relevant clinical pathways, inter-professional roles, law and ethics, and mental health, within the context of the chosen issue. Demonstrate understanding of planning, and evaluation of care.
40% |
Thorough and in-depth discussion of relevant nursing practice. Discussion demonstrates an excellent understanding of best practice, pathopharmacology, relevant clinical pathways, inter-professional roles, within the context of the chosen issue. Demonstrated excellent understanding of planning and evaluation of care. Excellent reference to ethical issues and mental health. Excellent references to, discussion and inclusion of, ANMC competencies. | |
| Conclusion
Succinct synopsis of the salient key points discussed in the paper.
10% |
Conclusion is logically drawn from the body of the paper, clear demonstration that key points have been discussed. Synthesis of material is clearly evident. | |
| Referencing
Cotemporary peer reviewed journal articles are used. Correct referencing style as per Harvard Referencing Guide.
10% |
Referencing conforms to Harvard referencing style peer reviewed sources are well utilized and integrated into the text. Referencing is correctly formatted. Evidence of advanced reading and research. | |
| Presentation
10% |
Writing is presented clearly and logically with no spelling or grammatical errors. Introduction, main content and conclusion are clear and concise. Excellent academic presentation of the work. | |
| Mark
____/100
|
Comments:
|
|
Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.