Posted: May 6th, 2015

Was the Bush Doctrine a radical departure in American Foreign Policy or simply a sensible reaction to new realities?

Essay title
Was the Bush Doctrine a radical departure in American Foreign Policy or simply a sensible reaction to new realities?

First of all,,, this essay will be fully monitored and scanned for Plagiarism and references
Plagiarism is the act of taking someone else’s work and passing it off as your own. This includes incorporating either unattributed direct quotation(s) or substantial paraphrasing from the work of another/others. It is important to cite all sources whose work has been drawn on and reference them fully in accordance with the referencing standard used in each academic school.

Please make sure NO single direct sentences or extracts to be taken at all expect some direct quotation which must be put in quotation marks
eg 3.In fact, “a flexible mind is a healthy mind” (Palladino & Wade, 2010, p. 147).

Make sure you must put the right references under the point or paragraphs straightaway don’t wait till the end of the paragraph and never put tow references tougher at the end. As in my previous order the writer have put the wrong references which was discovered by the university

Structure
Introduction, say what are you going to discuss in this essay and what is about
Essay body answer the essay question and well structure it using the provided sources
Conclusion, highlight the main point discussed in the essay

Please make sure to pay attention to the grammar and spelling and punctuation
Avoid complicated and unclear sentences and paragraphs.
Must write in academic style.
Refrences . use at least 8 references provided below in addition to the article which I will upload
fully, as follows: (Bauman 2006: 45). At the end of point or paragraph
bibliography
Use Harvard System and list works alphabetically to author
Example, Ayra, C. (2003) Design of structural elements. 2nd ed. London: Spon Press.

Assessment Criteria pleas pay attention
Presentation & Expression
You should be able to demonstrate independence of mind in your reading and research, adding to the specified bibliography where you judge this to be appropriate. You must though be discerning in your selection of sources.

Argument & Analysis
You should be able to develop original ideas and independent lines of inquiry, within a coherent theoretical framework. You should be able to argue confidently and persuasively, critically appraising rival arguments, and supporting your own arguments with appropriate forms of evidence. You should demonstrate an ability to draw from, and show the connection between, theory and practice in the field of political inquiry.
Knowledge & Content
You should be able to (a) evaluate the nature and status of information and evidence in the literature; (b) identify contradictions and gaps in arguments; and (c) attempt to resolve these by synthesising ideas and arguments. You should be able independently, to identify, retrieve and process information from a range of sources.
A note on sources
Whilst there is a wealth of good material available on the internet there is also a great deal of inappropriate material on websites. If you are using internet sites this must be in addition to the academic material in journal and books and should be from academically reputable websites. If you are unsure whether a particular source is a useful and acceptable one please ask the module leader for guidance.

George W Bush use books below
9/11 in Retrospect. By: Leffler, Melvyn P., Foreign Affairs, 00157120, Sep/Oct2011, Vol. 90, Issue 5 (this article will be uploaded )
P. Dombrowski. & R. Payne (2003) ‘Global debate and the limits of the Bush Doctrine’, International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 4 No. 4
J. Mann (2004) Rise of the Vulcans. The History of Bush’s War Cabinet
R.S. Conley (2005) Transforming the American Polity. The Presidency of George W. Bush and the War on Terror
R. Haas and M. Indyk (2009), ‘Beyond Iraq’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 88, No. 1
Z. Brzezinski (2010) ‘From Hope to Audacity’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 89, No. 1
M Leffler, (2011) ‘9/11 in Retrospect, George’s W Bush’s Grand Strategy, Reconsidered’ Foreign Affairs, Sep/Oct, Vol. 90, Issue 5

G.C. Edwards III and D. King (2007) The Polarized Presidency of George W. Bush
M. Leffler (2004) ‘Bush’s Foreign Policy, Foreign Policy Sept/Oct.
R.Jervins (2003) ‘Understanding the Bush Doctrine’, Political Science Quarterly 118, 3
R. Jervis (2005) ‘Why the Bush Doctrine Cannot Be Sustained’, Political Science Quarterly 120, 3
P. Klinkner (2006) ‘Mr. Bush’s War: Foreign Policy in the 2004 Election’, Presidential Studies Quarterly 36, 2
I. McAllister (2006) ‘A War Too Far? Bush, Iraq, and the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election’, Presidential Studies Quarterly 36, 2
M. Durham (2004) ‘The American Right and the Iraq War’, Political Quarterly, 75, 3
M. Cox and D. Stokes (2012) US Foreign Policy, chs. 18, 20
R. J. Lieber (ed) (1997): Eagle Adrift: American Foreign Policy at the End of the Century
M. Cox (1995): US Foreign Policy After the Cold War: Superpower Without A Mission?
M. Hirsh (2002): Bush and the World, Foreign Affairs, Vol.81 No.5
G. J. Ikenberry (2002): America’s Imperial Ambition, Foreign Affairs, Vol.81 No.5
J. F. Hodge & G. Rose (2001):How Did This Happen? Terrorism and the New War
G. Byford (2002): The Wrong War, Foreign Affairs, Vol.81 No.4
S. G. Brooks & W. C. Wolliforth (2002): American Primacy in Perspective, Foreign Affairs, Vol.81 No.4
Z. Sardar & M. Davies (2002): Why Do People Hate America?
J. Nye (2002): ‘The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone’ Diplomatic History (2002): The Road From September 11th: A Roundtable, Vol.26 No.4

Useful websites:
Council on Foreign Relations www.cfr.org
Foreign Affairs www.foreignaffairs.com
Brookings Institute http://www.brookings.edu/about/programs/foreign-policy
Foreign Policy www.foreignpolicy.com
Foreign Policy in Focus http://www.fpif.org/ #