Posted: September 13th, 2017

We have seen that one of the distinctive features of environmental issues is that many of them spring from grassroots movements.

Question 1:
We have seen that one of the distinctive features of environmental issues is that many of them spring from grassroots movements. The paradox is that most of them raise significant scientific, technical issues. The governance arrangements for managing them have a tension between the need to include scientific expertise in the response without excluding the groups and interests who “own” the issue in the sense that they raised it in the first place. How might this tension be addressed?
Answer 1: (please include in-text citations (at least 1 sources are required):

 
Question 2:
What do you think about extending the Montreal Protocol so that it covers HFC’s? We know that HFC’s have a benign impact on the ozone layer but their global warming impact is more than 800 times that of carbon dioxide. But can a treaty which was agreed to by all nations to stop ozone destruction be applied to the more controversial purpose of limiting GHG’s. Does the proposal itself suggest failure of Kyoto? A good place to start might be Velders, G et. al. “Preserving Montreal Protocol Climate Benefits by Limiting HFCs” Science Vol 335 24 February 2012. www.science.org
Answer 2: (please include in-text citations (at least 1 sources are required):

Reference list for question 1:

Reference list for question 2:
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT 🙂