Posted: February 3rd, 2015
Paper, Order, or Assignment Requirements
Assignment Brief | |||||||
Module Title: | International Auditing | Module Code: | BM519 | ||||
Assignment No/Title: | Social and Environmental Audits | Assessment Weighting: | 50% | ||||
Submission Date: | 5th December 2014 | Feedback Target Date: | 16th January 2015 | ||||
Module Co-ordinator/
Tutor: |
Alex Afakordzi | Course Area | BAM | ||||
Submission Instructions: | |||||||
This assignment is to be submitted electronically using Blackboard | |||||||
|
|||||||
Instructions to Students: | |||||||
|
|||||||
This assignment tests the following Learning Outcomes for the module: | |||||||
On successful completion of this assignment, the student should be able to:
|
|||||||
The Assignment Task: | |||||||
Marks will be awarded for clarity of expression, the relevance of points raised, the smooth flow of ideas, logical arguments, information technology skills, organised presentation and background knowledge evidenced by the extent of bibliography and appendix. Include a contents page, an introduction, a conclusion and a list of references. All pages must be numbered. 10 marks
|
|||||||
Assessment Criteria: | |||||||
Please see the Assessment Grid below.
|
|||||||
Quality Assurance Record
|
|||||||
Internal Approval: |
|
External Approval: |
|
||||
BM519 International Auditing 2014-15
Assessment Grid for Coursework – Social and Environmental Audits (S&E Audits)
|
||||||
|
Weight |
A
70%+ |
B
60-69% |
C
50-59% |
D
40-49% |
E and F
<40% |
Task aHistorical development and justification of S&E Audits |
20% |
At least two acceptable definitions of S&E Audits given, referenced and clearly explained. Historical development of S&E Audits traced and a convincing justification for S&E Audits offered. References to at least three well-known catastrophes cited. | At least two acceptable definitions of S&E Audits given and explained. Historical development of S&E Audits traced and a good justification for S&E Audits offered. References to at least three well-known catastrophes cited. | At least two acceptable definitions of S&E Audits given, without explanation. Historical development of S&E Audits traced and some justification for S&E Audits offered. References to two well-known catastrophes cited. | One acceptable definition of S&E Audits given without explanation. Historical development of S&E Audits traced without offering justification for S&E Audits. No well-known catastrophe cited. | No acceptable definition of S&E Audits given, no explanation offered. A poor account of historical deve-lopment of S&E Audits, without offering any justify-cation for S&E Audits. No well-known catastrophe cited. |
Task b Relevance of S&E Audits to Statutory Audits (SA) |
20% |
An acceptable definition of
SA is offered, referenced and clearly explained. A discussion of the impact of social and environmental issues on SA, the stages affected, how affected. |
An acceptable definition of
SA is offered, referenced and fairly explained. A discussion of the impact of social and environmental issues on SA, the stages affected, how affected. |
A definition of SA is offered, without reference or explan-ation. A discussion of the impact of social and environmental issues on SA, the stages affected, how affected. | A poor definition of SA is offered, without reference or explanation. A poor discuss-ion of the impact of social and environmental issues on SA, no reference to stages affected. | A very poor definition of SA is offered, without reference or explanation. A very poor discussion of the impact of social and environmental issues on SA, no reference to stages affected. |
Task cDiscussion of impediments and benefits of S&E Audits |
20% |
10 benefits of S&E Audits identified and discussed. 10 impediments of S&E Audits identified and discussed |
8 benefits of S&E Audits identified and discussed. 8 impediments of S&E Audits identified and discussed |
6 benefits of S&E Audits identified and discussed. 6 impediments of S&E Audits identified and discussed |
4 benefits of S&E Audits identified and discussed. 4 impediments of S&E Audits identified and discussed |
2 benefits of S&E Audits identified and discussed. 2 impediments of S&E Audits identified and discussed |
Task dTypes and objectives of Internal Audit and |
20% | Types and objectives of IA are identified and explained in detail. A comparison and contrasting between IA and EA under-taken | Types and objectives of IA are identified and fairly explained. A comparison and contrasting between IA and EA under-taken | Types and objectives of IA are identified and explained. A comparison and contrasting between IA and EA under-taken | Types and objectives of IA are identified but poorly explained. A poor comparison and contrasting between IA and EA under-taken. | Types and objectives of IA are identified without explanation. A poor comparison and contrasting b/n IA and EA under-taken, |
IA’s role of risk management
|
10% | IA’s role of risk managem-ent clearly explained and its impact on S&E commitment discussed in detail. | IA’s role of risk managem-ent fairly explained and its impact on S&E commitment fairly discussed. | IA’s role of risk managem-ent fairly explained and its impact on S&E commitment poorly discussed. | IA’s role of risk managem-ent poorly explained and its impact on S&E commitment poorly discussed. | A poor discussion of IA’s role of risk management. No impact on CR and S&E commitments discussed. |
Report Writing(how the final written report is structured and presented, citing and referencing)
|
10% |
Report very well written, clearly expressed, properly structured and comparable to a masters’ level. Sources appropriately and adequate- ly referenced including in-text citations.
Within ±10% 3000 word-count. A readable and smooth report. Instructions carefully followed. Spelling and grammar carefully checked. |
Report well written, clearly expressed, properly struct- ured and comparable to a masters’ level. Sources appropriately and adequate- ly referenced including in-text citations.
Within ±10% 3000 word-count. Instructions carefully followed. Spelling and grammar carefully checked. |
Report well written on the whole, largely clearly expressed, structured and just close to a masters’ level. Sources appropriately refer-enced but without in-text citations.
Within ±10% 3000 words. Instructions largely follow- ed. Some spelling mistakes and grammatical errors here and there. |
Report poorly written, poorly expressed. No Introduction and/or Conclusion offered. Sources poorly referenced Not strictly within ±10% 3000 word-count. Instruct- ions not followed. Spelling and grammar largely poor. | Report poorly written, poorly expressed, poorly structured and below undergraduate standard. No Introduction and/or Conclusion offered. Sources not referenced. Largely out of word-count. Instructions not followed at all. Spelling and grammar horrible. |
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.